Is XT.com MiCA-licensed?
Status checked on 2 August 2026 against the official ESMA register
XT.com does not hold a verified MiCA CASP licence. The user agreement names no operating legal entity. It restricts the US, Canada and Singapore, but no EU or EEA state. In 2023, Québec’s regulator imposed a CA$2 million penalty on the site’s operators and ordered the site blocked there. XT.com is not on the ESMA CASP register.
Practical effect: XT.com has no verified CASP authorisation. Check the contracting entity and any separate permissions before you rely on MiCA conduct, safeguarding or complaint rights.
See the tracked MiCA-licensed exchanges, or read what changed on 1 July 2026.
At a glance
- Supervising or reporting authority
- None recorded
- Entity jurisdiction or country context
- Seychelles
- EEA MiCA authorisation
- Not authorised in the EEA
- MiCA register route
- No current entry
- Register entry date
- No current entry date
- EEA passporting
- No
- Exchange type
- CEX
- MiCA services
- Not recorded in the current register
Common questions
Can I still use XT.com from the EU?
MiCA does not itself make account holding illegal. National and product rules can still apply. Since 1 July 2026, an in-scope provider generally needs an Article 63 authorisation or an eligible Article 60 notification route. XT.com can apply location restrictions or close user accounts.
Is money on XT.com protected under MiCA?
XT.com has no verified CASP authorisation. Do not assume that MiCA conduct, safeguarding or EU-regulator complaint rights apply to the service. Verify the contracting entity and any separate permissions.
Is there a MiCA-licensed alternative to XT.com?
Yes. 51 of the exchanges we track have current MiCA register entries. The licensed list shows each mapped entity, regulator and entry date.
