Exchanges without a MiCA licence
These platforms are still applying, operating only under a transitional regime, or restricting and withdrawing services for EEA users. After 1 July 2026, serving EU/EEA clients without a CASP authorisation is outside the rules.
Decentralised lending/borrowing protocol; outside MiCA’s scope for non-intermediated services.
Singapore-based exchange (formerly BitMax); not on the ESMA CASP register.
bitFlyer Europe operates under the transitional regime and states it is applying to Luxembourg’s CSSF; not yet on the ESMA register.
Cayman-registered exchange; not on the ESMA CASP register.
Global exchange with Hong Kong roots; no MiCA CASP authorisation on the ESMA register.
Australian exchange (also UK FCA-registered); not on the ESMA CASP register.
Estonian exchange operating under the transitional regime; no confirmed MiCA CASP grant located.
Australian AUSTRAC-registered exchange; not on the ESMA CASP register.
Offshore exchange with undisclosed home jurisdiction; not on the ESMA CASP register.
Dubai VARA-licensed derivatives exchange (now owned by Coinbase); the Deribit brand is not on the ESMA register.
Australian AUSTRAC-registered exchange; not on the ESMA CASP register.
Polish exchange on the legacy VASP register; Poland’s CASP law was delayed, so no MiCA authorisation exists yet.
Estonian consumer exchange; no confirmed MiCA CASP grant located as of mid-2026.
UK/South Africa-based exchange (DCG-owned); not on the ESMA CASP register.
Not a MiCA CASP: an AFM-authorised MiFID II venue for EUR crypto perpetual futures (ex-Bitpanda Pro) — crypto derivatives fall under MiFID II, not MiCA.
Fully decentralised AMM; no CASP required where there is no identifiable intermediary.
South Korea-based exchange (ProBit Global); not on the ESMA CASP register.
US/UK-based multi-asset platform; no MiCA CASP authorisation on the ESMA register.
Indian exchange restructuring after its 2024 hack; not on the ESMA register.
See the MiCA-licensed exchanges or the full filterable directory.