MiCA licence in Poland: no designated authority yet

Short answer

Poland had no designated MiCA authority for crypto-asset service providers in the KNF notice of 23 June 2026. ESMA’s CASP data dated 6 October 2026 lists no current entry with Poland as home state, and 178 firms authorised elsewhere that notified services into Poland.
CASP authority
Not designated
Transition ended
1 July 2026
CASPs with Poland as home state
0
Firms passported into Poland
178
On this page8 sections
  1. Who authorises CASPs in Poland?
  2. CASPs authorised in Poland
  3. Firms passported into Poland
  4. Tracked exchanges in Poland
  5. Article 110 warnings
  6. How to apply for a MiCA licence in Poland
  7. Frequently asked questions
  8. Sources

Who authorises CASPs in Poland?

The KNF said on 23 June 2026 that no Polish authority, including the KNF, had been designated for most MiCA-supervised activity. The notice makes an exception for e-money tokens and says the old Polish virtual-currency register is not a MiCA permission. A proposal to designate the KNF does not create an operative Article 63 route.

Lead CASP authority
Not designated
No designated CASP authority (KNF was proposed)
Transition ended
1 July 2026
ESMA's list still shows a six-month period, but Poland never enacted it. The KNF gives 1 July 2026.
Authorities in ESMA’s CASP file
None
No entry with Poland as home state
White papers notified here
1
0 other crypto-assets (Title II), 1 e-money tokens (Title IV)

The sources list links to the official notices. ESMA publishes the interim MiCA register that this page reads, and the searchable CASP register holds every entry from it.

CASPs authorised in Poland

ESMA’s CASP data dated 6 October 2026 lists no current entry with Poland as home state. MiCA still applies, and the gap does not let a firm operate without authorisation. Residents can use firms from other EEA states that notified Poland as a host state, listed below.

Firms passported into Poland

In all, 178 firms authorised in another EEA state may serve residents of Poland. Each one lists Poland as a host state for at least one current service in ESMA’s file, through the Article 65 cross-border notification route. Most come from Cyprus (20), the Netherlands (20), France (18) and Malta (18).

Show all 178 firms notified into Poland

Tracked exchanges in Poland

We track 52 licensed exchange and broker brands. The groups below sort them by ESMA’s home and host states for Poland.

A missing notification means ESMA’s file names no service in Poland for that legal entity. The brand may still reach Poland through another group entity or a later notification, so check the record before you rely on it. Platforms in the last group restrict EEA services or are still applying; see exchanges without a MiCA licence.

Article 110 warnings

ESMA’s Article 110 file dated 16 September 2026 holds no entry reported from Poland. The file is a warning dataset and not a complete list of unauthorised firms.

The MiCA warning list shows every entry with its reporting state and date.

How to apply for a MiCA licence in Poland

Without a designated authority there is no confirmed domestic Article 63 route in Poland. A business that wants to provide crypto-asset services must base its real management and operations in another EEA home state, apply to that authority and then notify Poland as a host state under Article 65. MiCA’s authorisation requirement continues during the gap, and waiting does not give a firm permission to operate.

MiCA routes for a CASP with Poland as home state
RouteWho uses itStatutory timing
Article 63 authorisationA new crypto-asset service provider25 working days to check completeness, then 40 working days to assess the complete file
Article 60 notificationAn entity already authorised as a bank, investment firm, e-money institution or similarNotification at least 40 working days before the first service
Article 65 notificationA CASP authorised in another EEA state that wants to serve residentsThe home authority forwards the notification to the host state
Annex IV minimum capital by class for an Article 63 CASP
MiCA classMinimumTypical service scope
Class 1€50,000Orders, execution, placing, transfers, advice and portfolio management
Class 2€125,000Class 1 plus custody and crypto exchange services
Class 3€150,000Class 2 plus operating a crypto-asset trading platform

Article 67 sets the requirement at the higher of the Annex IV minimum or one quarter of the previous year’s fixed overheads. The statutory periods cover the regulatory review only: preparation and questions from the authority add time. The CASP licence guide maps the services, documents and process, and the MiCA licence cost guide separates capital from fees and running costs.

Frequently asked questions

Who issues a MiCA CASP licence in Poland?

No Polish authority had been designated for most MiCA crypto-asset services when the KNF published its notice on 23 June 2026. A Polish business cannot rely on a domestic Article 63 route until a designation takes effect.

How many CASPs are licensed in Poland?

ESMA’s CASP data dated 6 October 2026 lists no current entry with Poland as home state. A further 178 firms authorised in other EEA states list Poland as a host state under Article 65, so residents can still use MiCA-authorised providers.

When did the MiCA transition period end in Poland?

An eligible firm could rely on the national transition in Poland until 1 July 2026. ESMA's list still shows a six-month period, but Poland never enacted it. The KNF gives 1 July 2026. After that date a provider needs its own MiCA authorisation, a valid Article 60 notification or an Article 65 notification from another EEA home state.

Can a crypto firm licensed in another EU country serve customers in Poland?

Yes, through Article 65. A CASP authorised in another EEA state tells its home authority which services it will provide in Poland, and that authority forwards the notification. ESMA’s data lists 178 such firms for Poland. They do not need a separate CASP licence in Poland, although local rules outside MiCA, such as marketing, tax and anti-money-laundering requirements, can still apply.

Sources

Official sources

  1. No designated CASP authority (KNF was proposed): official siteknf.gov.pl
  2. ESMA interim MiCA registeresma.europa.eu
  3. ESMA’s Article 93 competent-authority listesma.europa.eu
  4. ESMA’s Article 143 transition listesma.europa.eu
  5. Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 on EUR-Lexeur-lex.europa.eu

Register data through 6 October 2026; Article 110 data through 16 September 2026. Reviewed 14 October 2026. Authority responsibilities and firm counts change; confirm the current position with the authority and ESMA before acting. This page gives general information and does not provide legal, tax, regulatory or investment advice.

Compare the other EEA states

The country comparison lists the authority and current CASP count for all 30 EEA states. The register shows every legal entity behind the totals.